Chelsea Fontenel vs Magdalena Smekalova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Oct at 09:53 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Fontenel vs M. Smekalova

SUI
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fontenel 1 - 0 Smekalova
They have played 2 sets in total, with Chelsea Fontenel winning 2 and Magdalena Smekalova winning 0. The last match between Chelsea Fontenel and Magdalena Smekalova was at the W75 Hamburg, 19-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Chelsea Fontenel getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fontenel | 1 |
| Smekalova | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W75 Hamburg(10-19-25)
C. Fontenel vs M. Smekalova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 45.90% (56-66) | Career Total W/L | 51.16% (22-21) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Fontenel vs M. Smekalova Match Preview:
- What insights can we gather from second serve performances? In the recent form, Chelsea Fontenel slightly edges out Magdalena Smekalova with 38.94% of points won compared to Smekalova's 38.46% on their second serve.
- Examining return game stats reveals that Chelsea Fontenel has a minor advantage on second serve returns, winning 49.74% of points versus Smekalova's 48.48%.
- For first serve returns, Smekalova leads with 37.17% of points won, overshadowing Fontenel's 34.49%.
- Under pressure, Smekalova shows resilience by saving 51.85% of breakpoints, compared to Fontenel's 49.72%.
- Looking at performance over the last year, Smekalova has a slight edge with a win rate of 52.38% in matches, while Fontenel has a win rate of 47.73%.
- On clay surfaces, Smekalova performs better with a 54% win rate, while Fontenel excels on hard courts with a similar 54% win rate.
- The level of competition favors Smekalova, who has faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 260.33 compared to Fontenel's 372.73.
- Both players exhibit consistency in deciding sets, holding a 50% win rate each in the past year.
- It's crucial to observe the current event stats to determine who is in better form during this tournament.
Editorial Prediction (October 19, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent and past performance data, both players exhibit comparable second serve efficiency. However, Chelsea Fontenel holds a slight advantage in second serve returns.
Magdalena Smekalova's ability to save breakpoints more effectively and her experience against higher-ranked opponents could provide her an edge in critical moments of the match.
Considering surface preferences, the surface may influence performance, but both players excel on specific surfaces that are different from each other, making the current event surface pivotal.
Taking into account performance under pressure and previous match context, Magdalena Smekalova is slightly more favored to secure victory in the upcoming match. However, it is essential to also consider the specific tournament conditions and live game dynamics.
Chelsea Fontenel vs Magdalena Smekalova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Fontenel vs M. Smekalova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:15:6 | Average Match Time | 1:15:6 |
| 69% (31/45) | 1st Serve % | 53% (27/51) |
| 74% (23/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (14/27) |
| 79% (11/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (12/24) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (25/51) | Return Points Win % | 24% (11/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Fontenel Recent Matches Played
M. Smekalova Recent Matches Played

C. Fontenel vs M. Smekalova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 45.90% (56/66) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.16% (22/21) |
| 46.24% (129/150) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.00% (48/48) |
| 49.00% (1293/1346) | Games Win/Loss | 50.17% (432/429) |
| 46.67% (21/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 44.44% (24/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.05% (20/17) |
| 47.83% (11/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 177 | Aces Total | 41 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 248 | Total Double Faults | 150 |
| 1:22:17 | Average Match Time | 1:6:7 |
| 456.73 | Average Opponent Rank | 278.6 |
| 65% (4016/6176) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1064/1772) |
| 59% (2382/4016) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (598/1064) |
| 44% (948/2159) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (277/708) |
| 45% (325/727) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (96/199) |
| 44% (2743/6217) | Return Points Win % | 45% (773/1728) |
| 45.54% (46/55) | Challenger W/L | 15.38% (2/11) |
| 47.62% (10/11) | Futures W/L | 66.67% (20/10) |
| 46% (55/119) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (22/43) |
| 65% (13/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 53% (20/38) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (6/10) |
| 85% (53/45) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (22/19) |
| 13% (53/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (22/3) |
| 14% (69/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (21/3) |